All Collections
Election Setup - Ballot Page
Choosing the Right Voting System
Choosing the Right Voting System

An overview of plurality, approval, cumulative, preferential and scored voting

ChinosoN avatar
Written by ChinosoN
Updated over a week ago

ElectionBuddy offers a range of voting systems to enable you to find the system that best aligns with your group's values, priorities, and goals for effective and representative governance. Various voting systems exist to address some of the concerns of voters such as fairness, accurate representation, diversity of candidates, strategic voting and vote splitting.

Your choice of voting system for your ballot question impacts two vital parts of your election:

  • How your voters vote

  • How the votes are tallied

ElectionBuddy offers multiple voting systems to meet your voting needs. To be sure that you're picking the right one for your vote, this article will compare and contrast some of our voting systems to help guide you to the right choice.

Plurality vs. Approval

The Approval voting system is the most commonly misused voting system on our site. The Approval voting system is not the same as approving a bylaw amendment/budget/candidate. It cannot be used to do those types of votes.

  • Can be set up to be used to elect a single option, whether that is a candidate or a "Yes"/"No" statement.

  • When set up this way, options are mutually exclusive; you are choosing between options and can only cast one vote.

  • Works for "Yes/No" situations. Examples include: passing a bylaw amendment, ratifying a budget or contract, and acclaiming a single candidate for an executive position.

  • The option with the most votes at the end of the vote wins. If you're just doing a referendum with two options, this will naturally be the option with the majority (i.e. the option with greater than 50% of the votes).

  • Used to elect a single candidate for a position.

  • Candidates are not mutually exclusive of each other; you may select (vote for) as many of the listed options as you like. This means that it inherently cannot work for a "Yes/No" situation because voters can vote for both "Yes" AND "No" options.

  • Can be used as an alternative to plurality in any single-winner candidate scenario, such as selecting board, committee, and executive members (e.g., President, Vice-President), and is excellent for voting on winners for awards.

  • The candidate with the most votes at the end of the vote wins.

Plurality vs. Cumulative

Plurality

  • Used to elect single or multiple candidates for a position.

  • The number of votes you can cast is equal to the number of vacancies for the position; however, you can only vote for a specific candidate once.

  • It is the voting system used in North American political elections, and is also commonly known as "First past the post".

  • It's often used for electing board, committee, and executive members (e.g., President, Vice-President).

  • The candidate(s) with the most votes at the end of the vote wins. If running a plurality with a single vacancy and two candidates, the winner will hold the majority (i.e. received greater than 50% of the votes).

  • Used for electing multiple candidates for a position.

  • The number of votes you can cast is equal to the number of vacancies for the position.

  • Can distribute your votes to the candidates as you see fit: all votes to a single candidate, some votes to one candidate and some to another, or a single vote to each of your desired candidates.

  • Legislated as the mandatory voting method in California Homeowners' Association elections.

  • Is not the same as a weighted ballot because all voters receive the same number of votes to distribute across candidates, whereas weightings can be different for each voter. Additionally, a weighted ballot does not allow you to distribute votes across candidates.

  • Can be used for electing board, committee, and executive members (e.g., President, Vice-President).

  • The candidates with the most votes at the end of the vote wins.

Preferential vs. Scored

  • Used to elect single or multiple candidates for a position.

  • Instead of selecting options on a ballot, you rank candidates in order of most preferred to least preferred.

  • Not all candidates need to be ranked, but rankings can only be used once (for example, two candidates cannot receive a ranking of "1").

  • Can be used for electing board, committee, and executive members (e.g., President, Vice-President).

  • Votes are assigned to candidates based on voter preference (i.e. a candidate who received a "most preferred" rank will receive one vote from that voter).

  • When multiple vacancies are available for a position (i.e. multiple candidates are being elected), Single Transferable Vote (STV) is used to calculate the vote redistribution through rounds.

  • The candidate(s) with the most votes at the end of the vote wins.

  • Used to elect a single candidate for a position.

  • Can also be used to run rating scale questions where there is no winner elected (i.e. you are running a survey).

  • Instead of selecting options on a ballot, you score/rate candidates/options on a given scale.

  • All candidates/options must be scored/rated, but the same scores/ratings can be used more than once (for example, two candidates can receive the same score of "1").

  • It's good for electing board, committee, and executive members (e.g., President, Vice-President), as well as running survey, collecting feedback, and approving new members into your organization.

  • When being used to elect a winner, the candidate with the highest average score is the winner.

  • When not being used to elect a winner, the total vote breakdown is displayed for your interpretation.

For any questions, please send us a chat using our Buddy Messenger in the bottom right of the screen.

Did this answer your question?